2
let arr = [(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4), (5, 5)]
arr.map(\.0) // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

效果很好。但以下代码无法编译:

let keyPath = \(Int, Int).0
arr.map(keyPath)

无法将类型 'WritableKeyPath<(Int, Int), Int>' 的值转换为预期的参数类型 '((Int, Int)) throws -> T'。
无法推断通用参数“T”。

4

2 回答 2

4

Array.map期望带有签名的闭包(Element) throws -> T

在 Swift 5.2 中,允许将关键路径作为函数/闭包传入(这里是一个进化提案),但只能作为文字(至少,根据提案,它说“暂时”,所以这个限制可能会被取消)。

为了克服这个问题,您可以创建一个Sequence接受关键路径的扩展:

extension Sequence {
   func map<T>(_ keyPath: KeyPath<Element, T>) -> [T] {
      return map { $0[keyPath: keyPath] }
   }
}

(来源:https ://www.swiftbysundell.com/articles/the-power-of-key-paths-in-swift/ )

然后你可以做你想做的事:

let keyPath = \(Int, Int).0
arr.map(keyPath)
于 2020-09-06T13:41:04.837 回答
0

进化提案展示了如何使用运算符来执行此操作,但您也可以使用相同的[]or()语法,无论它是否部分应用,因为下标和函数不需要参数。

let oneTo5 = 1...5
let keyPath = \(Int, Int).0
XCTAssert(
  zip(oneTo5, oneTo5).map(keyPath[]).elementsEqual(oneTo5)
)
let keyPath = \Double.isZero
XCTAssertFalse(keyPath[1.0]())
public extension KeyPath {
  /// Convert a `KeyPath` to a partially-applied get accessor.
  subscript() -> (Root) -> Value {
    { $0[keyPath: self] }
  }

  /// Convert a `KeyPath` to a get accessor.
  subscript(root: Root) -> () -> Value {
    { root[keyPath: self] }
  }
}

public extension ReferenceWritableKeyPath {
  /// Convert a `KeyPath` to a partially-applied get/set accessor pair.
  subscript() -> (Root) -> Computed<Value> {
    { self[$0] }
  }

  /// Convert a `KeyPath` to a get/set accessor pair.
  subscript(root: Root) -> Computed<Value> {
    .init(
      get: self[root],
      set: { root[keyPath: self] = $0 }
    )
  }
}


/// A workaround for limitations of Swift's computed properties.
///
/// Limitations of Swift's computed property accessors:
/// 1. They are not mutable.
/// 2. They cannot be referenced as closures.
@propertyWrapper public struct Computed<Value> {
  public typealias Get = () -> Value
  public typealias Set = (Value) -> Void

  public init(
    get: @escaping Get,
    set: @escaping Set
  ) {
    self.get = get
    self.set = set
  }

  public var get: Get
  public var set: Set

  public var wrappedValue: Value {
    get { get() }
    set { set(newValue) }
  }

  public var projectedValue: Self {
    get { self }
    set { self = newValue }
  }
}

//MARK:- public
public extension Computed {
  init(
    wrappedValue: Value,
    get: @escaping Get = {
      fatalError("`get` must be assigned before accessing `wrappedValue`.")
    },
    set: @escaping Set
  ) {
    self.init(get: get, set: set)
    self.wrappedValue = wrappedValue
  }
}
于 2020-09-06T15:24:12.787 回答